← Back to Squawk list
California challenges San Bernardino air cargo facility used by AmazonState argues FAA minimized environmental impact in greenlighting project. (www.freightwaves.com) More...
Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
They probably just forgot to put the Prop 65 warning label on it: Warning, this facility contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
Were I to post my true opinion of Califailure's government, I would be kicked off this site.
Sounds like Cali gov’t mafia is shaking down a proven money maker. The Godfather, Part 6 ?
How do I read the article with out singing up for anything
Not sure. sign up is free, but asks for a bit of info. Or try a different browser.
This part of CA has lousy air. It has always had lousy air. The airport really isn't the problem. It's the pollution from all the big rigs that are the problem. All of those truck have to drive 90 miles from the LA ports to San Bernardino in traffic moving about 10 mph much of the time. The FAA approved the project because there really wasn't an environmental issue with the airport, per se. The State is saying, wait, you have to look at the whole scope of the project. Both are right, and both are wrong.