Back to Squawk list
  • 50

Why Aren’t Passengers Who Evacuate With Bags Being Punished?

Submitted
Should passengers be punished or fined for taking their baggage with them during an emergency evacuation? (www.gatechecked.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


DaveIsaacs
David Isaacs 16
I seem to recall a plane burning at Tokyo airport a few years ago and no fatalities. I think the conclusion was that the flight attendants did a great job of herding the cattle. It is a tough sell when people don't see any signs of danger and attendants are not taken as having any real authority. Take their photos and publish them on media.
srbh41413
Scott Hancock 25
Would have to credit the Japanese culture that follows rules/instructions rather more than global average.
pcaronlpcaron
Phil Caron 4
After the collision it took 4 minutes before the 2 front exits were opened, 7 to 8 minutes before the single rear exit was opened. All the while some passengers remained seated because no evacuation order had been given over the PA system. Those passengers finally evacuated once the captain did a walk through the cabin before he left. The airplane fire finally spread to the cabin after 10 minutes. So, the passengers were lucky that the fire was slow to spread, otherwise a lot of passengers would have perished due to the slow evacuation.
craiglgood
Craig Good 2
The dangers of commenting without reading the article.
Sailor48
Peter Gardner -2
I remember seeing a Singapore Airlines 777 (I think) with right wing seriously on fire and Pax were taking their bags. Indians if I remember correctly.
Xaircanada
Eric Watt 30
All it takes is one entitled idiot to screw up an evacuation and people will die. FAA should push some law that holds those who do not obey the emergency rules accountable with huge fines/jail time.
ChrisCollingwood
Chris Collingwood 9
If you obstruct my path to an exit during an emergency, I'm going to push you out of the way or walk over you. Any other time, I'll gladly help you get your bags out of stowage. I participated in a simulated evacuation in 1999 and remember the chaos of trying to get out in the dark. Based on that experience, I now try to sit as close as possible to an emergency exit
bdjam
Brian James 15
Isn't there a federal law about not following instructions of the flight crew? Passengers are told during the safety briefing that they should leave bags behind in case of evacuation. Seems taking bags during evacuation is ignoring flight crew instructions. The same penalty should apply. Even my flight attendant friends agree.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 0
What about those with essential meds in their bags. What are they supposed to do. Survive the evacuation but die of a heart attack because of the stress or go into a diabetic coma because their meds are in a bag under the seat at the bottom of the sea or incinerated?
nrigg
Nigel Rigg 1
Can't believe you're replying to nearly every post with this. Unless they're carrying a machine or an enormous amount of meds with them then don't keep them in your carry on. Keep them handy. If someone does need a carry on amount of drugs then fine, but I imagine they'll be few and far between.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
You would be surprised just how many meds some people need to stay alive. And they are essential. Going on holiday for three weeks need several different meds, not something you can be selective about.
MikeInPA
Mike InPA 2
If you have more meds than can fit in a small bag to go under the seat, then maybe you need to wait until everyone else has gone past you, and then get your overhead bag.

And if the plane is destroyed in the process, you will probably be able to get emergency medications.

What if you getting your meds causes others to be killed or injured?
nrigg
Nigel Rigg 1
You're right, I would be surprised if LOTS of people need a carry on full of meds, but as I've said if that's the case then fine. However, there are entitled folk who undoubtedly put a handful of essential meds in their carry on when it's far safer for everyone to keep them handy.
Highflyer1950
Highflyer1950 28
Lockable overhead compartments…….locked for Takeoff & Landing. O2 & med kits excepted. If they are going to act like toddlers, treat them as such.
jkeifer3
Joe Keifer 5
That may work in some cases but not all. I keep the important stuff beneath the seat in front of me.
wettej01
wettej01 4
Agreed. And, while you shouldn’t have anything, I don’t feel quite as strongly about someone having their backpack on, but people grabbing their roller bags is just idiotic.
franciemr
Fran Moreno-Randle 1
If a pax can comfortably sit in the seat with backpack on and not have backpack touch paxs sitting next to, then OK I agree. But if not, then no - some backpacks are larger than a permitted carryon.
nrigg
Nigel Rigg 1
I disagree. A backpack takes up space. You only need 2 of these being carried down the isle and that's the width of person - someone that may die because of their space to safety being compromised by a backpack!
sledogpilot
Duane Mader 0
Not a bad idea
andrewbors
Andrew Bors -1
It would be better if they were locked from tack off to landing. Don’t know many people who need a change of clothes in the middle of a flight and haven’t seen a laptop that wouldn’t fit in the space in front of you.
Sailor48
Would need cabin crew access in case of device failure and fire. Has happened and will happen again.
MikeInPA
Mike InPA 1
Have you ever had liquid spilled on you? Had an accident in your pants? How about a baby with all it's needs?
ArchangelInflight
Michael S -1
I support this, in theory. Though in practice, how would they all be locked simultaneously, electronically? Because going around and locking each individual bin would be unnecessarily tedious and time-consuming for the crew.
NX211
NX211 12
None of the measures spoken of here today really addresses the core reasons people have for not wanting to leave their belongings behind. A complete lack of confidence in airlines to reimburse passengers for loss of property fairly and promptly. Restore that confidence and passengers will be much more willing to leave possessions behind.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
Some passengers have essential meds that they CAN'T leave behind, heart meds, insulin etc.
MikeInPA
Mike InPA 1
Whatever you would need should be at your feet in a small bag or in your pockets.
Fiona13
Michele Ashby 1
Then they should carry their essential meds in their pocket. I do!
ghotalin
George Hotaling 1
In an emergency evacuation where you and others may lose your life, you are worried about reimbursement? it must be tough being you!
EB333
Erik Bruner 12
In an emergency situation, any passenger reaching for the overhead locker will quickly find my footprint on their back.
katjohnson764
Unless they are twenty rows ahead of you, and you can't get to them. Not a solution to the problem.
gagroome
gagroome 9
There absolutely should be consequences for passengers who evacuate with bags. It's not that they don't value their own lives; it's that they don't value others'. I keep my passport and wallet in my pocket except while at cruise. That way I'm not tempted to take anything in hand in the event of an emergency evacuation. It also makes it easier to overpower any selfish fools in front of me delaying evac because they are trying to get a bag out of the overhead bins.
vblue0115
They definitely should be punished. They could cost someone their life by delaying, plus can hurt themselves going down the slide with backpacks/luggage. What you have in those bags is NOT worth your life or the life of another passenger. I label these folks as IDIOTS!
Sailor48
Yes and whatever they carry could possibly damage/deflate the Chute trapping following Pax inside.
sasdrtx
Steve Smith 2
When it happens at an airport, then the airport police should arrive soon enough to arrest those are carrying bags. And after the pax are removed from the area, any baggage left on the ground should be destroyed. I doubt this policy would have to be executed very often before selfish assholes get the message.
PatriciaBellm
Hyflyer1950 proposed a solution: All overhead bins can be locked in the case of an emergency evacuation. Passangers are informed about that and don't even need to reach for the bin - it is locked, basta. Grab your kids, your iphone and leave the plane.
andrewbors
Andrew Bors 1
How about just locking them for the entire flight? Need something during the flight ask for assistance or just make sure to place it under the seat in front of you. Don’t know many people who need a change of clothes in the middle of the flight.
SAchaput50
Personally, I think a fine should be charged, but only if the luggage in question does not contain needed medical equipment or medication. Saving your favorite pairs of shoes isn't a necessity.
MLSellers
Time for the FAA to OUTLAW Luggage in the cabin. take the damn bins out and only allow a small item that fits on the floor under the seat. As long as they are allowed to bring the entire contents of their home on board and they do not listen to Crew Members this crap will continue right up to the loss of lives.
Fiona13
Michele Ashby 3
Maybe ailrines should stop charging fees for checked baggage!
jshhmr
josh homer 5
They'll install a second floor of seats lol.
dittoheadadt
Andrew Tl 5
Talk about a solution in search of a problem. How many times do we have crashes and people taking their stuff with them? We have 30,000 domestic flights daily in the US. Eleven million flights a year and you want to ban carryon bags so that EVERYONE has to check bags and then EVERYONE has to wait at carousels, all because a handful of clowns during the extremely-rare crash grab their bags on the way out? You think airports are chaotic now, just wait until everyone is checking their bags and everyone is crowding the carousels.

Come on. Banning carryon bags is one of the more demented ideas regarding commercial flying.
sasdrtx
Steve Smith 1
Not true. Watch Airport, the 1968 version. No overhead storage for anything more than pillows and blankets. Apparently back in the good ol' days, no one even thought about humping their own bags all over the airport and on to the plane. The aviation world used to be civilized.
sledogpilot
Duane Mader 7
Agreed Andrew. Can’t believe the lack of thinking through this situation with all the people saying to ban carry ons.
Spiff666
Tim Walker 8
Banning carry ons will put a LOT of lithium batteries in cargo holds ...NOT A GOOD IDEA!
Sailor48
Exactly there will be enough entitled, arroghant people doing that now without banning carryons.
Sailor48
Kneejerks not thinking it out.
katjohnson764
Yes. Yes, I do. Plan accordingly.
bruceahz
Hmm, is the inconvenience of waiting at the carousel worth your loved one's life?

Yes, crashes are rare, but the cost of ignoring the all too common failure to leave personal items behind is extremely high.

Banning carry-ons may not be the best solution, but it is absolutely NOT a solution in search of a problem.
Radonda1
Ron Blacic 1
Just think how much faster de-planning would be?
love2flygirl
I'm with you, Mildred. The Hobo Haulers are the reason flights are slow to get everyone seated and slow to exit, much less evacuate. Either pay to check your bag or bring less junk. You look ridiculous!
sparkie624
sparkie624 5
Yes they should be punished and Vry Harshly! In an emergency for an Evacuation, your Belongings are replaceable. Someone's life is not! Why would some of these people feel so entitled that they are willing to Risk Someone else's life... A Good punishment would be a $25,000 fine for starters and give them some Jail Time to think about it! If it doesn't fit in your pocket before the evacuation starts, then it should stay behind. That includes Pocket Books, Laptops, anything that you carried on is replaceable....
admiral506
You know the entitled karens/darins will claim their medication is in there and must have it or its life threatening or my documents are in there.
I say they make an announcement before closing the door that the bins will be locked in an emergency evacuation and anyone who doesn't agree with that please de-board the aircraft
andrewbors
Andrew Bors 3
As harmless as that looked didn’t mean it couldn’t turn into something much worse in a moment. Frankly it would have been better if the pilot had said something like they are evacuating due to possible fire or explosion and the passengers would have made sure no bags got off.

The FAA really needs to look at real life evacuations and do unannounced evacuations drills with real passengers. I believe they had 90 or 120 seconds to evacuate the plane and I’m pretty sure it took longer than that. Start fining the airlines and manufacturers when evacuation targets are not met and you will see changes real fast. Don’t allow them to use the defense they can’t control passengers. If passengers know if they bring a bag down an evacuation slide they will be banned from flying again they won’t bring the bag down. If the manufacturer knows they will get fined they will make sure to include enough emergency exists that people can get off and that the bins lock so people can’t bring them if they want too.
Amerserv47
Steve Scholz 1
absolutely, it slows evacuation of all passengers. and selfish persons taking luggage could be denying others evacuation when a catastrophic event may be brewing, though not seen by passengers
linbb
linbb 3
Nothing new entitled people doing what ever they want as usual. YOU CANNOT FIX STUPID. Proven here was on a 777 and saw one person boarding with a huge back pack on smacked a lady in the head never even said excuse me.
love2flygirl
The two-bag carry-on is way too generous. I'm surprised the airlines aren't grappling for the dough they lose by making you check your bag. Besides, it's like some people are moving in. First, let's hoist the bag up. Then let's take off the coat and get situated. Maybe the items don't go under the seat until it's time for take-off, and then you find the guy next to you is resting his head on your lap to angle stuffing in his belongings. Repeat the process in reverse when deboarding, holding up the line again. Hobo Haulers are the worst.
SAchaput50
I'm often surprised by the large roll-on luggage some folks bring on. It's like they are moving or traveling for over a month. I don't know why this is allowed yet I see people forced to check in a bag half the size.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
Maybe those people have essential meds, equipment. Have you never thought of that. We are told, by the airlines and airport security, to keep our essential needs and necessary equipment in our hand luggage, meds in hand bags, equipment in carry on luggage.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
We are told, by the airlines and airport security, to carry our medications with us at all times in our hand luggage. We keep ours in our underseat bags.
So, in view of the lovely caring and considerate comments below, what are passengers supposed to do who have their medications in those bags.
Evacuation is a very stressful time. So is it fair that a passenger could survive the evacuation but die of a heart attack etc., due to their extremely important medication being in the underseat bag at the bottom of the ocean or incinerated in the crash. You think that it is fair that a passenger, whose three week holiday supply of medications, is expected to leave them behind with no expectation of an early rescue.
N.B. Question marks are not allowed in any posts.
nrigg
Nigel Rigg 2
If said medications are that critical to someone then keep them on yourselves for the flight (pockets or small purse type bag - not in a carry on). It is totally unacceptable for ANY bag to be carried off in an emergency. If you're sat away from an exit it might be YOU that dies due to some entitled person taking up YOUR exit space with their bag.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
Some meds won't fit in a small bag, some are already packaged, in A4 sized trays, combinations of which to be taken at certain times of the day. You have a problem with that, take it up with the pharmacies and manufacturers.
nrigg
Nigel Rigg 1
That still doesn't need to be kept in a carry on. Put it in the seat back. I repeat - no bag is acceptable to be carried out in an emergency.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
We are told by the airlines AND airport security that essential meds, for our whole holiday, are to be in a personal bag to fit underseat. Not in the overhead compartment and definitely NOT in the hold luggage. That's what we do.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
Really, do you have any idea what size those trays are. No, you don't. Each one A4 size by half an inch thick, 4 compartments by 7 days, three weeks holiday. What about diabetics and their insulin injections. Obviously you are a very healthy individual physically, with no medical conditions. Lucky you.
nrigg
Nigel Rigg 1
Look, this just comes down to common sense. You appear to have a counter argument to every suggestion going that might save a life, including your own. And not that it's any of your business but I do have meds that I need to take each day but that doesn't stop me from thinking about others instead of just saying 'it's allowed'. Still, that's you and I'm me.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
My comment wasn't published because of invalid characters. Really. A questionmark is not a valid character.
francoismarathon
François Marathon 1
It's bad enough to lose your luggage - be it carry-on or checked - in an aircraft fire on the ground. It's worse to get out of it alive without your cell phone, ID, credit card and driver's license (add to that list your medication if it's essential). Worst of all is to not make it alive because you had tried to recover all your carry-ons.
Good news though: you only need to keep these thin, lightweight essentials with you in a fanny pack at all times when flying, and will be just as safe when the need for evacuation arises, leaving all the other stuff behind.
I would not even need to waste time looking for or carrying stuff if I had to evacuate one day: I always have the above described fanny pack on me at all time when flying.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
What if your pack isn't big enough for your phone, credit cards, and all your essential medication. What would you leave behind.
francoismarathon
François Marathon 1
I would leave the phone. Medication can be difficult to obtain (especially if you really need it at a short notice), and a credit card can buy you a new phone and a local SIM card. Not that I disregard the inconvenience (to say the least) of that new phone not being the one which identifies you for various transactions.
feaco
Frank Austin 1
There are too many electronics on board nowadays. People work from takeoff to touchdown and are afraid of losing their work. I agree with the idea of move it or lose it. Nothing is irreplaceable.
Elvisf16
Grady Morton 1
“This can be attributed to a major culture difference, as Japanese prioritize things like social other…”

Social other? Lmao.
scubaboy3c
Steven Williamson 1
Only 2 possible solutions I see - either no carry on bags allowed, or lock the overhead bins, and do not unlock them for evacuation.
musocat
Idiots.
Depqua
Rema Allen 1
They should be heavily fined. I guess they would rather die with their things than live having to shop to replace the potential loss of personal items. Plus, no consideration or concern for other peoples lives. Intolerable.
katjohnson764
I like the idea of lockable overhead compartments, but think that it is important to include strong warnings in the pre-flight announcements that the compartments will auto-lock. Also, the announcements and the emergency info cards should have LARGE, very clear warnings about strong penalties.
I also would support the compartments being locked until the captain turns off the no seatbelt signs on arrival. Stop the disobedient rush to deplane!
MikeInPA
Mike InPA 1
It would be fun when a compartment doesn't unlock when commanded.
katjohnson764
That can happen with lots of things in life. That is an argument against doing it.
NX211
NX211 0
Or a lock that is damaged and unable to be opened because of a battery/electronic device fire.
TXCAVU
SAFETY BRIEFING. In case of an emergency... do NOT take carry on items as they may impede the safety evacuation process. Violators are subject to Federal Regulations as id smoking in the lavatory.
davidbdeal
David Deal 1
I flew internationally for 40 years. I wore Columbia fishing shirts or a jacket and I kept all my money and passport in my pockets. Also did not take shoes off until we well established in the climb. Carried a small flashlight when it was still OK. Did not take melatonin. All advice I received back in the day from a seasoned flight attendant. I saw first hand the results of melatonin when we returned to Houston (after about 3 hours and the meal) due to a mechanical problem and one person could not get himself off the plane because he had taken melatonin with his meal.
Elvisf16
Grady Morton 1
Or it could have been the Xanax they took with their melatonin.
cparks
cparks 1
Ditto, but I still carry a powerful flashlight, and the iPhone goes in a pants pocket until 10K.
cookiepotter550
FIRST: let's BAN the folks who are caught by TSA with weapons from ever flying again. And as to the question of the day: what if I have my purse on my lap- why can;'t I carry it out? Men have their id's and cc's in their pants. And I also agree 100% with NX211.
daxwax
John Kurc 1
Flogging them with bamboo reeds would help.
TiredTom
Tom Bruce 0
so so happy I don't fly anymore.... every other week for 20+ years... now? happily staying away from the mad crowds at airports...phew!!
Fu11ofGrace
Noyb family 0
I suppose that bag of medicines isn’t really that important after all. Insulin, easy to get ahold of at any airport. Heart meds? Same. Etc etc. My corporate computer - they won’t mind if someone else gets their hands on it. Maybe just let those who leave their bags behind get off first, then those who want to grab their stuff before deplaning can go. I heard no mention of “those needing assistance and parents with babies” going first either.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
Yes, disabled, travel assist passengers are never first on and always last off.
We have actually heard that those with babies and young children are called first, but never the disabled. We know that from many, many experiences, having to battle our way through passengers messing about with their bags on getting on.
We don't mind being last off, because, by the time the lift arrives and we've gone through border checks, our bags are ready at the collection point, others standing around for ages waiting for their cases to appear on the conveyor.
But our meds are always in our hand luggage in our underseat bags, heart meds etc.
What really annoys me is passengers queueing up before the plane had even reached the arrival gate, queuing to get off. Drunks belching and sweaty bodies at face level of seated passengers. They can not get off before the doors are opened!
rlowney
rlowney 0
As the flight attendant he's them to the slid ditch the bag to the side. They'll never miss it
MikeInPA
Mike InPA 4
First type a comment then have the drink

[This comment was deleted.]

MLSellers
I am not MAGA I am crew member.
Hate the damn overhead bins. these selfish brats only think of themselves.
Wish LUGGAGE......rollerboards and suitcases were outlawed as carryon.
bubblecom
Robert Fleury 1
Lack of proper social behavior and inflated selfishness has replace compassion and solidarity. Example from the top (the very top) does not arrange matters...
mikabjork
Mika Bjork -2
Make sure you ware a mask to protect others from TDS.
Nooge
Nooge 1
Un a ware that there is no vaccine for stupid

I needed to "ware " a mask around you after you self treated yourself with Ivermectin

States without mask mandates (where 65.7% reported wearing masks) have an approximately 30% higher death rates than states with mandates, where 75.1% reported wearing masks (87.7 deaths per 100,000 vs. 67.4 per 100,000 in states with mask mandates).

Darwins law in action
avionik99
avionik99 -1
The same reason people who take forever to get their act together to board and deplane are not fined. Talk about your entitled idiots and toddlers!!
Sailor48
Was on a domestic Flight in Philippines one time. Upon arrival at destination a Japanese or korean man was demanding they open the door. The Airbridge wasn't even there yet. There's one round every corner.
conradp99
conradp99 1
And those are the SAME "gate fleas" in Group Z who cluster at the podium when Group A is boarding!
jkeifer3
Joe Keifer -3
No longer allow the carry-on of duty-free alcohol either. Literally, what a "flaminng" disaster that stuff could turn into!
travistx
travistx 5
A tiny amount of ethanol is going to have practically zero effect compared to tons of jet fuel.
andrewbors
Andrew Bors -1
Big difference between “practically zero” and “zero”
jkeifer3
Joe Keifer -3
LOL. Not if the plane ran out of fuel and took off with a bunch of booze hounds on board.
jrgargiulo
absolutely,
emjay111
Recently flew YVR to LHR with BA. As we queued on the airbridge, a heavy steel frying pan fell out of a plastic bag that the passenger in front of us was carrying. The guy had so much carry on, he literally couldn't handle it all himself.

The same frying pan fell on the floor another two times as we made our way to our seats, before finally falling out of the overhead locker one last time. If it had landed on someone, it would have seriously injured or killed them.

My question is why someone carrying a heavy steel frying pan is allowed to bring it on board. It's not useable during the flight, and presents a serious safety hazard.

I bet in an evacuation, the same passenger would have been reaching for his frying pan first.
conradp99
conradp99 2
As TSA, we'd regularly see pax with barbell plates (!) and similar 'crazy' stuff in their carryons; those were not prohibited and it was obvious the pax didn't want to pay $$$ for an 'overweight' checked bag. So onboard they went....
Sthan
Maybe it's time to change the certification requirement, so it can take into account each passenger with 1 bag.
MikeInPA
Mike InPA 1
sgbelverta
sharon bias -2
Easy jet only allows overhead bin usage for a fee. Airports are some of the most monitored area's in the world. If you want to charge people a penalty for taking a bag during an emergency, they can be tracked down. But all the airlines have to agree on this. Part if the flight attendants message could be: If you try and take your overhead bag during an emergency, you will be charged a $1000.00 fee. The TSA can and will track you down, so don't try it.
russellarthurjohns
Russell Johns -1
Anyone who evacuate the plane with baggage should be arrested onsite and charged with attempted murder. Maybe a long prison term might get their attention.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
So essential medication is not a reason to take a bag with you. Survive the evacuation but die of a heart attack or a diabetic coma due to essential meds being in an underseat bag at the bottom of the ocean or incinerated in the crash. Thank you for your kind and caring comment.
Elvisf16
Grady Morton 1
You need to go back to law school and brush up on the concept of “mens rea.”
mwdepaoli
God help the person in front of me who prevents us from evacuating during an emergency. I will knock them down and walk over them. Lives could be in danger. Let them suffer the consequences, just not the rest of us.
Elvisf16
Grady Morton 3
By the time you do all that knocking down and walking over, you could have just let them get their bag.
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
Glad to know that you are such a kind and caring human being. Instead of being a bully, desperate to be first off, why don't you ask what help is needed.
You could actually kill someone with your actions.
Knocking down = unconsciousness, walking over = broken ribs, punctured lungs, broken spine, neck, skull. If they survive that, they'd drown or burn to death.
Surviving an evacuation only to die of a heart attack or diabetic coma is not very fair is it. That passenger could be desperately trying to retrieve their essential meds. Do you think it's fair to push someone out the way when they're already so stressed out they are trying to retrieve their heart medication.
I hope I'm never on the same plane as you.

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!